NIVF relative valueRV
NewGenIvf Group Ltd. How this company compares with the rest of its industry group on the figures it reported in its last annual filing.
NIVF's operating margin of -226.9% ranks in the 14th percentile of 17 Medical Care Facilities sub-industry peers, fiscal periods ending between 2025-06-30 and 2025-12-31.
As of . Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL company facts. Method and limitations.
Against 19 Medical Care Facilities peers
| Metric | NIVF | Peer median | Percentile | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue FY | 4.7M USD | 29.8M USD | 24th | 18 |
| Revenue YoY | -13.0% | n/a | n/a | 2 |
| Gross margin | 20.2% | 22.7% | 50th | 6 |
| Operating margin | -226.9% | -12.8% | 14th | 17 |
| Net margin | 209.0% | -16.4% | 97th | 18 |
| Return on equity | 37.1% | -42.7% | 85th | 9 |
| P / E | n/a | n/a | n/a | 3 |
| 1 year | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
Source: SEC EDGAR XBRL company facts (public domain); prices from Kresmion's daily equity market-data snapshot. Fiscal periods ending between 2025-06-30 and 2025-12-31. Prices as of 2026-10-02. Every fundamental figure is one full fiscal year from one filing. Nothing is trailing twelve months and nothing is converted between currencies. P/E combines the market-price snapshot with annual earnings; one-year return uses market prices, dated separately above. 0001213900-26-037687
Peer set, 19 companies
FCHS, FOXO, RHEP, BMGL, BICX, CDIX, HLYK, AMS, SYRA, ADIA, CCM, GBCS, EHSI, PIII, CCEL, BTMD, DCGO, JYNT, AIRS
Left out: PAIYY (period gap), XCRT (no annual filing), PARK (no annual filing), WW (no annual filing), HWAIF (no annual filing), BACK (no annual filing).
What could not be compared
- 35 The filer did not report this line in the filing used.
- 22 The denominator is zero or negative, so the ratio has no meaning.
- 20 The price series does not reach back to the start of this window.
- 5 No annual filing (10-K, 20-F or 40-F) with fiscal-year figures.
- 3 This filer reports an ordinary share count and trades as a depositary receipt at a ratio Kresmion does not store, so price times shares would be wrong.
- 3 Fewer than 5 peers carry a comparable value, so no median, quartile or percentile is published.
- 1 Not meaningful: the prior year is zero, negative, or too small a base for a percentage to describe. Both figures are shown instead.
- 1 This company's fiscal year ends more than 200 days from the subject's, so it is a different economic year.
Free account
Open the relative value desk with a free account
An account turns this page into a research desk: thirty-one metrics over the whole peer set instead of eight, the distribution behind each median, the metric's history against the peer band, an editable peer set, the filing behind every cell, and CSV. The table above stays free.
Cite this data
Every fundamental figure is the full fiscal year reported on one annual SEC filing (10-K, 20-F or 40-F), named by accession. Peers are the company's industry group: the GICS sub-industry where the company is GICS-classified, otherwise the data vendor's industry label (the two label sets are not merged). A median, quartile or percentile is published only when at least five peers carry a comparable value, and a peer reporting in another currency is excluded from a level rather than converted. P/E combines the market-price snapshot with annual earnings; one-year return uses market prices, dated separately above.
Upstream: SEC EDGAR XBRL company facts
Kresmion, "NIVF relative value, Kresmion", data as of 2026-03-31, https://kresmion.com/tools/relative-value/NIVF. Upstream data: SEC EDGAR XBRL company facts.
Link to this data (HTML):
<a href="https://kresmion.com/tools/relative-value/NIVF">NIVF relative value, Kresmion (Kresmion)</a>