Skip to main content

Federal Register: proposed rule

Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers

Federal Register published "Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers" on 2026-09-10. First seen on Kresmion 2026-10-26 18:24 UTC.

As of . Source: www.federalregister.gov. Method and limitations.

The record

Publisher
Federal Register
Agency
Securities and Exchange Commission
Source
Federal Register
Kind
Federal Register: proposed rule
Jurisdiction
United States
Topics
Financial regulation
Importance
Notable, the middle of three tiers Kresmion sets by fixed rules from the source's own fields
Published (source time)
2026-09-10 (the source gives a date only)
First seen on Kresmion
2026-10-26 18:24 UTC

The original

Open the original on www.federalregister.gov

Source: Federal Register (federalregister.gov). U.S. government work, public domain.

The publisher's summary

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") is proposing to rescind the political contribution rule under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act"), which prohibits investment advisers from providing investment advisory services for compensation to a government client for two years after an adviser or any covered associate of the adviser makes a contribution to certain categories of elected officials or candidates, among other prohibitions. In the more than fifteen years since the rule was adopted, implementation challenges associated with the political contribution rule have resulted in a range of significant unintended consequences, including compliance practices among some investment advisers that may have had the effect of restricting all political contributions by the investment advisers and their employees. Market participants also have stated that the political contribution rule is burdensome, complex, and both lacks clarity and creates a de facto strict liability standard. The Commission is of the view that other existing requirements of the Advisers Act and its associated rules, including prohibitions on fraud, fiduciary duty requirements, the compliance rule, and the code of ethics rule (defined below), are likely sufficient to address pay-to-play practices while allowing an adviser the flexibility to implement an approach that is more appropriately tailored to its particular risks, rendering the political contribution rule unnecessary. The Commission also is proposing to amend the rule under the Advisers Act pertaining to books and records consistent with the proposed rescission.

The publisher's words, as published.

Federal Register document

Document number
2026-18424
Document type
Proposed Rule
Status
Published

Cite this data

Kresmion stores the publisher's own title, the source's time and the time Kresmion first saw it, and checks the primary link 1, 7 and 30 days after first sight. Kresmion adds no text of its own.

Upstream: Federal Register

Kresmion, "Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers", data as of 2026-09-10, https://kresmion.com/record/4780. Upstream data: Federal Register.

Link to this data (HTML):

<a href="https://kresmion.com/record/4780">Political Contributions by Certain Investment Advisers (Kresmion)</a>